About your Search

20121112
20121120
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)
take a look, dynavac technologies. we like the hepatitis vaccine. the government didn't like that. i think this is a curious overreaction. but it's a spec. you have to be careful. >>> let's go to dan in texas. >> caller: pch energy. >> down 16. mostly natural gas in ohio. if you watched the show, we told you it's mostly natural gas in ohio. i have been buying southwest, swn. why have i been buying southwestern energy? it's the pure nat gas play i want. i think it's going higher in 2013. >>> bill in south dakota. bill. >> caller: jim, my stock is american capital agency corp, agnc. there one is going to go down. why? maybe companies real estate investment trusts are worried about the taxation considerations, and we also have to worry about what the yield curve looks like and what they will do with fannie and freddie, so many -- so so many cost runs here, i think you should stay the course, but understand it's just another stock right now and it could lower. no longer charmed like it's wen. >>> john in new jersey. john. >> caller: professor cramer. >> thank you for the tenure. yes. >>
technology company. certainly when you think about silicon valley and companies that have hit hard times. very view come through it and re-emerge. apple is one that we can all remember having done that. ibm. although not a silicon valley company but technology company. most recently perhaps ebay in a significant decline but i spoke to john at length on friday and it appears they have brought around their marketplace business in addition to continue strong growth at the paypal unit. it's difficult to do. when you come back to yahoo! you have to wonder how do they do it? >> is there an act two? cisco tonight almost every analyst on the street said they're going to miss. >> universal in both miss and then the guidance is going to be negative. david, when you spoke with stevenson, didn't you get the sense that the companies are done spending on anything other than amd on towers? >> they got to spend. you know, stevenson was very outspoken in saying fiscal cliff. we're not spending but we are. we're deciding to spend $14 billion over the next three years. they absolutely have to in order to c
discretionary retail housing and technology spending. if they cannot hold their gait, then no stocks can right now. other than higher yielding names like coca-cola, verizon, at&t. those three indicators that i just gave you tells that the bad news is baked in, or if it isn't, they will allow us to speculate that the stock market itself with the daily nose dives has washington worried. they will get us through this, and we'll get through this, even as we have to admit that odds for going over the cliff have increased greatly because the sniping has begun. we as a country were so close, almost there. the jobs spigot about to be turned on. numerous domestic industries were turning to the positive, many for the first time in years. our stock market was taking on all the attributes of the bulls of yore. all of that is out the window, because in six weeks, the financial world as we know it will be torn asunder, and this has nothing to with how well companies do or how cheap stocks are historically, it's all about the pride of our elected leaders. what can i say? we deserve better. jack in ohio. jack
. but becoming real progress. the technology is too expensive. it is coming down fast. and the boxes which are built by whirlpool, general electric have the possibility of coming in at $500 apiece. further, there is already a natural gas distribution system in place. utility companies cover 65 million companies. if they were smart, light, utilities this is a good business for them, they can subsidize the boxes to allow for overnile fueling. the storms in the northeast showed the wisdom of hooking up a generator. this is a similar operation. the utilities should be behind them. you get the utilities providing the box. then the demand for the vehicles will expand dramatically and you'd have to believe that auto companies will then offer natural gas fuel option in mass. savings from fuel will be considerable for each household. right now you can see a 2 1/2 year payback for the vehicles as you the savings will be at $2,175 per household. cost about $4,000 more than a gasoline powered car. people don't like to pay that much though. they don't see the payback. the cost of the cars could come do
it comes to the technology that they were using to try to evade the surveillance state that they built. it's amazing. >> the other thing i find amazing is i remember going through the u.s. treasury in the height of the financial crisis, and back then, you had officials who were scribbling down important facts and figures on scrap paper because that was one of the few things they were able to legally throw away and get rid of. and if you go around other branches of the u.s. government today, people are intensely aware of the risks of e-mails being kept. if you go and talk to private sector banks, nobody working on a bank trading floor these days can possibly not be aware of the risks of tracking thoughts and e-mails. and yet somehow the military just seems not to have noticed this. it is very, very striking. >> there's one other dedataidei this "journal" story, kelley had second thoughts. and people said they made the request, quote, she was worried about the personal information being provided to investigators. >> like the diplomatic license plates. >> talk about the horse after it's left
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)